Jump to content

Swede nabbed at port for escorting 9yr old girl


Recommended Posts

greatplace

Swede nabbed at port for escorting girl, 9 2/22/2012

 

 

 

 

 

A 67-YEAR-OLD Swedish man was arrested yesterday in a Cebu City terminal as he was about to board a ship for Masbate province with a 9-year-old Filipina.

Port police stopped the foreigner on suspicion that he had violated a special law on the abuse of minors.

The girl, a native of Masbate, was turned over to the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI).

Jonny Lagstrem told Maritime police he had brought the girl to a hospital in Cebu City for medical treatment.

The Swedish national will have to explain the circumstances of their being together because Republic Act 7610 or the Anti-Child Abuse Law declares unlawful any person “keeping in his company a minor, 12 years or under or who is 10 years or more his junior in any public or private place” when the adult is not a relative or has any “bond recognized by law, local custom and tradition” or is not acting in the performance of a social, moral or legal duty.

Maritime police acted on a tip from an informant in Masbate province, the girl's neighbor. The girl lives with her grandparents.

Two policemen at the Cebu Ports Authority approached the man and child at 5:25 p.m. while they were sitting down in Passenger Terminal 3 waiting for their ship to Masbate.

NBI-7 special investigator Jedidah Hife said the girl was brought to a Cebu City hospital for examination and will be turned over to social workers.

Lagstrem remained silent in the police detention cell and refused to be interviewed by Cebu Daily News.

“We are gathering evidence to find out what appropriate charges we shall file against the suspect,” Hife said.

Hife said the tipoff to police was a good sign of “community awareness” of the problem of child abuse and child trafficking.

The Cebu Ports Authority referred the case to the Provincial Women's Commission which in turn sought the aid of the NBI-7. The arrest was made by Insp. Romulo Alcazar Jr. and SPO3 Noel Avenido. /By Ador Vincent Mayol, Reporter

 

 

 

 

Boy oh boy he might of been doing the right thing if the girl was ill or had health problems who knows......but for god sake don't people think what could happen being alone with a child......Why couldn't he brought with him a senior relative of the girl........or was he having a hidden agenda....mmmmmm...dumb dumb dumb

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 443
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cipro

    47

  • ArieBombarie

    44

  • Cary

    37

  • Experienced

    31

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

i personally have nothing to say at this point on is he guilty or not... and looking back i remember taking not one young girl 12 years old but also her sister 14 years old in a taxi to a resturant fo

Even if his intentions are good, he deserves the hassle for his stupidity, ignorance, and naivete for a 67 year old.

The sad part is, as my wife pointed out, they can and likely will manipulate the girl into saying whatever they want in an effort to justify this arrest. The guys intentions may well have been good (h

shadow

The sad part is, as my wife pointed out, they can and likely will manipulate the girl into saying whatever they want in an effort to justify this arrest. The guys intentions may well have been good (he appears to be taking her home), but by the time they get done with the girl who knows what will come out of her mouth.

 

No good deed goes unpunished in this country.

 

Larry in Dumaguete

Edited by shadow
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Alfred E. Neuman

Even if his intentions are good, he deserves the hassle for his stupidity, ignorance, and naivete for a 67 year old.

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
InternetTough

Even if his intentions are good, he deserves the hassle for his stupidity, ignorance, and naivete for a 67 year old.

 

Are you sure that your desire to punish is strong enough?

 

If his intentions were good, he obviously didn't deserve the trauma of being arrested/jailed.

 

The OP's warnings about what is prudent are totally correct, but being convicted for something like this would lead to an awfully rough time in prison. That is probably on his mind right now.

 

Being a naive good Samaritan should not be punished with that. Hopefully, the girl's grandparents will back up the Swede's story.

 

If they don't, it is probably because the Swede is guilty. Very few un-senile people would take a 9 year old girl anywhere without her guardian's express permission. It would have been prudent of the Swede to have gotten the written permission of the grandparents. Yes, that and a non-minor relative of the girl would have been prudent to take on the trip. Maybe the grandparents aren't healthy themselves and he was doing them a favor at their request. That would fall under "moral duty".

 

The hospital in Cebu would also have something to say about the seriousness of the girl's problem, and whether the Swede took her there at all.

Edited by InternetTough
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
Jack_be_nimble

According to the news item, they were on the return trip. So, a quick call to the hospital could verify his story.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Alfred E. Neuman
Are you sure that your desire to punish is strong enough? If his intentions were good, he obviously didn't deserve the trauma of being arrested/jailed.

 

I typed in "hassle" not punishment. He's a Darwinian candidate for sure good or bad.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Admin (Retired)
broden

either way it's a damn shame

 

i hope for his and her sake it ends up just being a hard lesson learned

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
musicman666

they should print something on the landing cards like where they warn about drugs in huge letters just so that no one walks into this situation innocently ..im sure a few people are not aware of this rule and may be co erced into some kind of scam using this law against them.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder why the girls neighbours reported him in the first place? is there a reward for............ or were they genuinely concerned?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

"Republic Act 7610 or the Anti-Child Abuse Law declares unlawful any person “keeping in his company a minor, 12 years or under or who is 10 years or more his junior in any public or private place”

 

Seams he is guilty.

Only maybe not of abuse, just ignorance and that don't count as difference in most civil countries.

 

I hope this is just a case of ignorance to the law and that it (the law) allows for some form of slap on the wrist.

And that the check ups the girl have to injure is in them self not a kind to actual abuse ......

 

Note to self : never go anywhere with little koia!

 

Rune

Link to post
Share on other sites
If his intentions were good, he obviously didn't deserve the trauma of being arrested/jailed.

 

Okay, let's say, for arguments sake that he was doing the right thing. He should have been smart enough to bring some of her family along with her. Why did he not do that? I mean, would the family not be concerned about her health as well?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
shadow

Okay, let's say, for arguments sake that he was doing the right thing. He should have been smart enough to bring some of her family along with her. Why did he not do that? I mean, would the family not be concerned about her health as well?

 

Well, she lives with her grandparents, maybe the family is rather dysfunctional. OFW? There could be a number of reasons. The neighbor reporting it is the biggest red flag to me.

 

Larry in Dumaguete

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Alfred E. Neuman

Well, she lives with her grandparents, maybe the family is rather dysfunctional. OFW? There could be a number of reasons. The neighbor reporting it is the biggest red flag to me.

 

Larry in Dumaguete

 

Red flag bigger than the "Kano" with a Pinoy child in an airport with no one else?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

“We are gathering evidence to find out what appropriate charges we shall file against the suspect,” Hife said.

 

We shall file against the suspect. Not may file against the suspect. It seems to me that the police already have in their minds that the man is guilty. It could be that he is guilty, or it could be that he was doing a good deed. But in the cops mind, he is guilty, and in the Philippines, that's as good as guilty. He better have a large sum of cash to hand over, or its his final days in a Filipino prison for him. Probably quite the opposite of a Swedish prison. Apropos for a pedophile, a horrible fate for a Samaritan.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
A_Simple_Man
Why couldn't he brought with him a senior relative of the girl

I am sure that young children are never molested by uncles, or fathers, or other relatives sarcasm.gif

 

Maybe the guy was 'doing bad' or maybe not. Any adult in care of a youngster as the potential for both. It is good that the authorities question the man and child but this:

 

“We are gathering evidence to find out what appropriate charges we shall file against the suspect,”

 

Is an automatic assumption that the man was not acting in the best interests of the child and it is unadulterated poison.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

Capture.JPG

I Understand...