Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
AmericanInCebu

Suckered into a crazy, crazy, low-stakes but complex scam!!

Recommended Posts

oztony
27 minutes ago, oztony said:

We are all older guys with younger wives ..or girlfriends , that is not at issue here. 

What is ...is the modus operandi , and I read this guys earlier post ...and wished to hell that Paul had of deleted it from existence , instead of it still being there and available to be viewed by whoever drops in ...( or regurgitated into threads like this )...

 

Edited by oztony
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
savarity

Admins can, of course, do whatever they want, whenever they want. I wouldn't be so naive as to claim otherwise.

I would just respectfully point out, that this forum developed a certain reputation before, a reputation even the OP of this thread referenced to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
oztony
12 minutes ago, savarity said:

Admins can, of course, do whatever they want, whenever they want. I wouldn't be so naive as to claim otherwise.

I would just respectfully point out, that this forum developed a certain reputation before, a reputation even the OP of this thread referenced to.

Well , that is why I left this thread open (instead of just hiding the last post and banning A.I.C. )  So people could have their sayso.

Would of been just too easy to shut the thread ...

Edited by oztony
grammar
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Davaoeno
8 minutes ago, savarity said:

Admins can, of course, do whatever they want, whenever they want. I wouldn't be so naive as to claim otherwise.

I would just respectfully point out, that this forum developed a certain reputation before, a reputation even the OP of this thread referenced to.

What he said was :   " I know this is a pretty harsh forum and I'm sure a lot of people will throw spitballs at me for being an idiot."

I see no sign at all of people putting him down for being an idiot. I see people putting him down for being a degenerate !! 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
savarity



What he said was :   " I know this is a pretty harsh forum and I'm sure a lot of people will throw spitballs at me for being an idiot."
I see no sign at all of people putting him down for being an idiot. I see people putting him down for being a degenerate !! 


Harsh, is the word I'm referring to.

Ironically, any insult, is against the posted rules, but I guess those don't apply once a member is banned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smokey

Different strokes for different folks 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jester

I'm not surprised, after reading about 1/2 way through the OP my BS alarm went off and I no longer followed the thread. 

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
oztony
2 hours ago, Headshot said:

Now, there are obviously a lot of middle-age women in our home countries that would disagree, but then they would likely see every one of LinC Forums members as perverts.

I would hope not Bill , you know there are a lot of varying age differences between the members of the forum and their wives .....10, 15 , 20 , 30 , 35 years ...but none of us are interested in socialising with a guy in his 50's talking about dating 18 year olds ...from facebook (and who knows how many ..over his 5 visits ) and  how they look 14 years old ...

I understand that you do not like my method of moderating , we all like new material and a bit of entertainment , but it has to be regulated on the open forums , we have to make decisions about suitable content in topics ...and the above just doesn't cut it ,  Is that the sort of stuff you want to see ???

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Headshot
36 minutes ago, oztony said:

I would hope not Bill , you know there are a lot of varying age differences between the members of the forum and their wives .....10, 15 , 20 , 30 , 35 years ...but none of us are interested in socialising with a guy in his 50's talking about dating 18 year olds ...from facebook (and who knows how many ..over his 5 visits ) and  how they look 14 years old ...

I understand that you do not like my method of moderating , we all like new material and a bit of entertainment , but it has to be regulated on the open forums , we have to make decisions about suitable content in topics ...and the above just doesn't cut it ,  Is that the sort of stuff you want to see ???

I make no judgement of any member based on the age gap between him and his wife. It really doesn't matter as long as both of them are happy with the arrangement. And that age gap existed when they were dating as well, so I don't judge members by who they date either.

AIC said that the girl he described in this topic looks like the 22-year-old that she is, so I don't see where you are coming from. It was other members who tried to say that she probably looked 14. AIC was more worried about her petite size that her facial appearance.

Tony, I generally have no problem with your moderating style. I know that you hated my moderating style, but that doesn't bother me. However, in this case, I think your spidey senses are flawed. Whippy is a known user of women (because he bragged about his exploits many times), and yet he was welcomed back and still belongs to LinC, but you somehow determined from just a few posts that AIC is worse? Don't you see the fallacy in that?

I hope that the owner and admins will review this decision and reverse it. If they don't, then all of the talk about making the forums more inclusive was just so many words, and there is no difference between this owner and the last.

Edited by Headshot
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
oztony
3 minutes ago, Headshot said:

AIC said that the girl he described in this topic looks like the 22-year-old that she is, so I don't see where you are coming from. It was other members who tried to say that she probably looked 14. AIC was more worried about her petite size that her facial appearance.

This whole version of what you say here is your own unresearched version and is complete misinformation to to people reading this thread .....read back through the posts and find your own mistakes with your misinterpretation ...because I just cannot be bothered doing it for you....Bill you are wrong and should really attempt better to get it right when engaging with this type of stuff ....

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
savarity
I make no judgement of any member based on the age gap between him and his wife. It really doesn't matter as long as both of them are happy with the arrangement. And that age gap existed when they were dating as well, so I don't judge members by who they date either. AIC said that the girl he described in this topic looks like the 22-year-old that she is, so I don't see where you are coming from. It was other members who tried to say that she probably looked 14. AIC was more worried about her petite size that her facial appearance.

Tony, I generally have no problem with your moderating style. I know that you hated my moderating style, but that doesn't bother me. However, in this case, I think your spidey senses are flawed. Whippy is a known user of women (because he bragged about his exploits many times), and yet he was welcomed back and still belongs to LinC, but you somehow determined from just a few posts that AIC is worse? Don't you see the fallacy in that?

I hope that the owner and admins will review this decision and reverse it. If they don't, then all of the talk about making the forums more inclusive was just so many words, and there is no difference between this owner and the last.

 

Seems OP said another girl looked 14 back three years ago in 2015, though he wasn't banned for that post at the time. What I'm not clear on is, what exactly is the ban-worthy offense in a person's private life, to the board's unwritten code of morality, and what exactly made OP a "degenerate?" Was it: 

 

-dating an 18 or 21 year old?

 

-possibly dating more than 2 people?

 

-his date's appearance?

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RogerDuMond
3 minutes ago, savarity said:

Seems OP said another girl looked 14 back in 2015, though he wasn't banned for that post at the time. What I'm not clear on is what exactly is the ban-worthy offense in a person's private life to the board's unwritten code of morality and what exactly determines a "degenerate," is it:

-dating an 18 or 21 year old?

-possibly dating more than 2 people?

-your date's appearance?

It is possible to find out.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kahuna
35 minutes ago, Headshot said:

Whippy is a known user of women (because he bragged about his exploits many times), and yet he was welcomed back and still belongs to LinC,

He'd been banned so many times he held the record for new identities[and still may].  I think you were very vocal about how it looked when he would make his conquest posts and saw that in a negative way and agreed he had to go back then.

I'm not saying AIC was another Whippy but there was a "smell" to this thread that got worse as it went on. Tony nipped it at the source which was the right thing to do and arguing openly now about how that looks for the forum with him is not right.You wouldn't stand for it back in the day. Tony's doing his job here..Let it be. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Headshot
25 minutes ago, oztony said:

This whole version of what you say here is your own unresearched version and is complete misinformation to to people reading this thread .....read back through the posts and find your own mistakes with your misinterpretation ...because I just cannot be bothered doing it for you....Bill you are wrong and should really attempt better to get it right when engaging with this type of stuff ....

Well, let me refresh your memory. You said...

12 hours ago, oztony said:

The impression that I am getting here is that the girl looks waaaaay younger than 16 .......:mellow:

But he said...

11 hours ago, AmericanInCebu said:

 she looked 22 except that her physique was the smallest I ever saw and I remember thinking, having the ID will head off problems. 

The woman he dated in 2015 was 18 years old, and this woman was 22 years old. Both women were of legal age. I see no problem with either situation. There is no offense worthy of a ban here. We have no evidence that AIC was abusing anybody, and there is no evidence that he was exploiting anybody. So, what is the offense for which you are banning him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Davaoeno
20 minutes ago, savarity said:

what exactly made OP a "degenerate?"

possibly his potty training went awry !

5 minutes ago, Headshot said:

There is no offense worthy of a ban here.

in your mind . However you are not the one making the decision.  

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Sailfish Bay Fishing Charters

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..